Close

New York Personal Injury Lawyer Blog 24/7

Updated:

New York Appellate Court Discusses the Manner in Which a Federal Case is Terminated

Section 205 (a) provides that: “If an action is timely commenced and is terminated in any other manner than by a voluntary discontinuance, a failure to obtain personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a dismissal of the complaint for neglect to prosecute the action, or a final judgment upon the merits,…

Updated:

Plaintiff Files Claim Pursuant to Labor Law §§200, 240, 241(6)

The action commenced was filed by plaintiff against defendant. That action was consolidated with the actions against the remaining defendants. The complaints assert causes of action for common law negligence and violation of Labor Law §§200, 240, 241(6) and the Industrial Code of the State of New York 12 NYCRR…

Updated:

New York Appellate Court Grants Defendant’s Summary Judgment Motion as Plaintiff Failed to Prove “Serious Injury”

That leaves the ninth and final category with which to sustain her claim for serious injury: a medically determined injury or impairment of a non-permanent nature which prevents the injured person from performing substantially all of the material acts which constitute their usual and customary daily activities for not less…

Updated:

New York Appellate Court Discusses “Serious Injury” Requirement in Proving Car Accident Case

In this personal injury action, plaintiffs claimed to recover monetary damages for personal injury allegedly sustained by him as the result of a motor vehicle accident that occurred in County of Suffolk, State of New York. A New York injury Attorney said that defendants filed several motions: the first one…

Updated:

Plaintiff Tries to Explain Two Year Gap in Treatment in Personal Injury Action

As previously stated, ever where there is ample proof of a plaintiff’s injury, certain factors may nonetheless override a plaintiff’s objective medical proof of limitations and permit dismissal of a plaintiff’s complaint. Specifically, additional contributing factors such as a gap in treatment, an intervening medical problem or a pre-existing condition…

Updated:

New York Appellate Court Said There was No Admissible Proof Indicating Causation

Plaintiff submitted no admissible proof of objective findings contemporaneous with the accident that would indicate causality between the injury allegedly sustained in the accident and the accident itself. The causal connection must ordinarily be established by competent medical proof. Additionally, plaintiff has failed to rebut evidence of a preexisting degenerative…

Updated:

New York Appellate Court Discusses Requirement to Show “Serious Injury”

The affirmed report of defendants’ independent examining neurologist, indicated that an examination conducted on April 7, 2006 revealed that there is no permanency from a neurological perspective. He opined that there is no objective evidence of any neurological disability or abnormality. The affirmed report of defendants’ independent examining psychiatrist, showed…

Contact Us