Published on:

On March 23, 2004 at around 6:00 A.M. a van was being driven by a man who fell asleep at the wheel

On March 23, 2004 at around 6:00 A.M. a van was being driven by a man who fell asleep at the wheel. He ran his van into the rear of a commercial commuter van that was double-parked on First Avenue near East 94th Street in Manhattan. A passenger who had just boarded the commercial commuter van and was not yet belted in to her seat was injured. She filed a lawsuit alleging that the commercial commuter van driver and the company that he worked for were just as liable for the accident as the man who fell asleep at the wheel and ran in to the back end of the commercial commuter van. Is there a DUI criminal charge in the offing?

The commercial commuter van driver and his company dispute this fact. They feel that a driver who is asleep at the wheel is more likely to cause a truck accident than the fact that the commercial commuter van was double parked. It was argued that while it could be a foreseeable event that a person who is asleep while driving will hit another car; it is also a foreseeable event that a commercial commuter van that is double parked on a busy Manhattan street for five minutes will be struck in the rear end by another vehicle. The issue at question is one of proximate cause. Is a person or company liable for personal injury resulting from an accident when they were merely in a place that sets a greater possibility for an accident to occur just as responsible for the accident as the person who directly stumbles in to the place that is already set up for a disaster? The court cited several precedent cases that allow for each side of this argument.

Ultimately the Supreme Court of Bronx County found that the motions by the driver of the commercial commuter van and the company that he worked for were possibly liable for the accident and the injuries which occurred as a result of the incident. Their request for summary judgment on liability which was denied by the district court is still denied. The Supreme Court agrees with the district court in this matter and affirms their decisions.

While courts can find it difficult to determine who holds the most fault in a truck accident, especially where both parties hold some sense of the liability, it is up to a jury to determine ultimate responsibility.

Issues of law are constantly changing. A person who is not specifically trained in the law cannot begin to know what all of their rights are without the assistance of a professional. Here at Steven Bilkis and Associates, we provide Truck Accident Attorneys, Injury Lawyers, Big Rig Jackknife Injury Attorneys, and 18 Wheeler Crash Injury lawyers. Commercial Truck Accident Lawyers will stand by you and ensure that your rights are protected. Wrongful Death Attorneys can argue your side and make sure that you and your loved ones are considered. We make sure that you are rightfully awarded compensation for your suffering.

Stephen Bilkis & Associates with its Personal Injury Lawyers has convenient offices throughout the New York Metropolitan area including other areas of New York. Our Commercial Truck Accident Attorneys can provide you with advice to guide you through difficult situations. Without a Personal Injury Lawyer you could lose precious compensation to help with your medical bills and the trauma to you and your loved ones following such a frightening experience. This is true even if the Attorney for the other side has not adequately made their case. Let us help you to recover from the devastation that has befallen your family. If you are

Contact Information