Close

Articles Posted in Personal Injury

Updated:

Appellate court denies summary judgement in a “storm in progress” case. Powell v. MLG Hillside Associates, L.P., 290 A.D.2d 345, 737 N.Y.S.2d 27 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

On March 7, 1999 at 9:15am, the plaintiff slipped and fell in the snow in front of her apartment building, injuring her ankle.  In the hours preceding her fall, there was a snow storm with about two inches of snow accumulating. The plaintiff filed a personal injury lawsuit against her…

Updated:

Appellate court rejects New York State’s “storm in progress” defense.  Scheuer v. State of New  (2021 NY Slip Op 05906)

In the case of a car accident that killed one person and severely  injured another, the appellate court was asked to consider whether the “storm in progress” defense  applied. Background On March 2, 2005, 25-year-old Jeremy Killenberger and 25-year-old James Croote were passengers in a car being driven by Kevin…

Updated:

New York City Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment granted – Garcia-Martinez v. City of New York, 2008 NY Slip Op 51321(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 6/13/2008)

The issue in this slip and fall case is who was responsible for making sure a sidewalk was clear of hazards by properly clearing snow. Plaintiff Garcia, who was 50-years old at the time of the accident, was seriously injured after stepping off a NYCTA bus in the early afternoon…

Updated:

New York Appellate Court discusses “serious injury” requirement pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 – Brown v. Achy, 2004 NY Slip Op 3703 (N.Y. App. Div., 2004)

The issue in this car accident case is whether the plaintiff has sustained a “serious injury” as defined by the New York Insurance Law statute. According to the law, in order for a plaintiff to make a claim for pain and suffering, the plaintiff must have suffered a serious injury.…

Updated:

Plaintiff Files Claim Pursuant to Labor Law §§200, 240, 241(6)

The action commenced was filed by plaintiff against defendant. That action was consolidated with the actions against the remaining defendants. The complaints assert causes of action for common law negligence and violation of Labor Law §§200, 240, 241(6) and the Industrial Code of the State of New York 12 NYCRR…

Updated:

New York Appellate Court Grants Defendant’s Summary Judgment Motion as Plaintiff Failed to Prove “Serious Injury”

That leaves the ninth and final category with which to sustain her claim for serious injury: a medically determined injury or impairment of a non-permanent nature which prevents the injured person from performing substantially all of the material acts which constitute their usual and customary daily activities for not less…

Updated:

New York Appellate Court Discusses “Serious Injury” Requirement in Proving Car Accident Case

In this personal injury action, plaintiffs claimed to recover monetary damages for personal injury allegedly sustained by him as the result of a motor vehicle accident that occurred in County of Suffolk, State of New York. A New York injury Attorney said that defendants filed several motions: the first one…

Updated:

New York Appellate Court Said There was No Admissible Proof Indicating Causation

Plaintiff submitted no admissible proof of objective findings contemporaneous with the accident that would indicate causality between the injury allegedly sustained in the accident and the accident itself. The causal connection must ordinarily be established by competent medical proof. Additionally, plaintiff has failed to rebut evidence of a preexisting degenerative…

Contact Us